"El Interruptor", main point was to show the audience of how much we did depend on technology and how we didnt continue being ourselfs. My partener opinion was, " I think this play wants to show us how we depend on technology and how we dont want to think and only depend on it". I think in part his opinion is right but in my case I think it was generally to show us how we depended on technology.
The play presented huge dynamic, especially on the actions. The characters kept moving all the time which made you pay a lot of attention to dont miss any of them. Because maybe one of them might have been very important to understand the play. But, it didnt only focused in making characterd dynamic in actions it also made the characters dynamic in dialogues.
In this case lights were essential for the play. Lights made the actors react in a different way. When light came from us, the audencie. The actors acted like a differnt character... which lately we found they were the program which was trying to complace us.. the public by performing different characters.
They had a big study in different kinds of characters and fast changes between them.
But, light wasnt the only thing which served for the change of characters, they also used a strange sound which transformed the actors in other characters.
In my opinion this was a very complicated play to form but lately it was a good one.
Still i wonder, why did they use different characters to give us a message? I mean... they could have show it by only the character they were at first. All characters had a great energy... why did they focused in using this type of characters and not other? How difficult was the part when they didnt saw the other one but had to do the same actions? I mean... this are very complicated things.
The main part of your entry should have been the answers to your final questions.
ResponderEliminarRoberto