When we were discussing about the parts of the play we touch the topic of the protagonist. I first thought it was the Feudal Lord because he was the one which spooked the most. Afterwards I figure out he wasn't the protagonist because of that. He was the protagonist because he was the one who made actions at the play and made the play depend on him. When we spoke about protagonists I went back to my infancy and started to think on my favorite characters. There were some characters as Helsing which was a vampire who killed everyone and formed part of a vampire clan. But with this class i figured out that even though his name formed part of the anime series the one who was the protagonist was the master of the vampires because with his actions the story was developed.
Before this class ive always had fought that the protagonists were the ones who had the biggest impact on the audience and the ones who had good values.
But, with this class i figured that protagonists can also be the bad ones of the story and the antagonist isn't the one who has bad values... it was the one who opposed the protagonist desire.
I don't quite remember the play "Sin titulo" but our teacher told us that this play didnt have a protagonist... but how can that be able? Isnt a protagonist the main key to develop the play? Isnt his/her actions who guide the play to follow a certain rythm? It might be i have other kind of questions because i wasnt here but how can it be to a play to start if there isnt a motive or desire of one or many people?
Not all plays are dramatic. There are many ways of approaching the performance of actions in front of an audience. You should remember "Sin título" because we saw it this year and you even made an entry, which is the reason we go to watch plays - so that you can use them as examples and learn from them. Your final questions would have been better if they had been formulated before that lesson, not after.
ResponderEliminarRoberto